You are viewing
djsacche's journal
![]() | |
|
I’m closing up shop here for a while and setting my sights on some other pursuits. I might resuscitate the journal format at some point down the line, but for now, this is the end of the line for Kaffee, nicht Känguruhs. Thanks for reading. |
|
![]() | |
|
In addition to work, socialism, nudity and sex, central and northern Europeans have quite a different take on marriage than their peers in the Another disparity I’ve found is the lack of stigma associated with having a child out of wedlock. When I spoke about the American tendency to tsk-tsk a couple who birth a child before marriage, a European friend of mine quickly stated, “Yeah, we don’t have that problem over here.” And it’s true. I know of several devoted couples with children who have been happy with one another for years who have given nary a thought to getting hitched. One need only look at Ségolène Royal, the recent runner-up in the 2007 French presidential elections, for proof that this particular strain of social disapproval has no place here. Not only have she and her ‘life partner’ parented four children, they’ve also lived in different houses for years. And the French thought so little of this that Royal garnered nearly 47% of the vote. Quite simply, this scenario is impossible to imagine in American politics. Furthering the Atlantic split on marriage and love, I’ve been faced with a myriad of questions from Europeans regarding the concept of ‘dating’ in the Building on this, in my experience in What I find so fascinating and vexing about life here is how artfully a society can juxtapose such seemingly ancient and traditional approaches to many facets of life with jarringly progressive and challenging stances on love, sex and marriage. So just when you think
|
|
![]() | |
|
There’s one place that can make me feel homesick like none other while living abroad – a spot where, upon leaving it, I feel a longing for Americana, its big cities, its frenetic pace, its endless possibilities, a longing like none other. The inside of a movie theater. It’s happened on many occasions, but last night, watching Zodiac (about the mysterious killing spree that took place in late 60s/early 70s San Francisco), I left the movie theater and was more than a little disappointed to pop out to the ancient, ornate, and tidy streets of Vienna’s Inner Stadt. Some films can be so gripping and enveloping that you simply expect to walk out to their world upon exit from the theater. Life continues apace in central |
|
![]() | |
|
As a close friend of mine recently put it, “The Austrians are horrible, horrible people.” Now, that’s a tad bit harsh, really, but dagnabit if I don’t find some truth to that statement at times. Why, just today, I spring out after a morning of job searching and checking box scores to snag some groceries. I grab my reusable euro-bag (you gotta bag your own here, son) and head to the not-so-super market, and what do I find greeting me as the doors slide open? Why, nothing less than two elderly Austrian men berating one another in some of the loveliest German imaginable, right at the front of the store! As the Austro-spectacle unfurls before my eyes, I let out a few guttural guffaws and try to piece together what these two fascinating specimens are jousting over. But with their slapdash Wienerisch speeding along at a cadence that I simply can’t follow, I have only my imagination to fill in the blanks on what these two old bastards are quarrelling over. So I pick up my groceries, laughing over the din of Fight Night at Zielpunkt, passing customers who can’t fathom just what I’d be laughing about. It’s all too funny to me. They’re funny for me. If I don’t let the bad vibes and pessimistic folk get to me, it is simply hilarious at points. Sometimes it’s as if I’m living in some sort of This |
|
![]() | |
![]() My swing has been an absolute mess this year. I’ve felt lost at the plate, striking out far too often and simply not getting the job done. My slot in the three-hole has slipped to seventh or eighth in the order over the past few games, and for right reason. I wouldn’t hit me third the way I’ve been swinging at the plate. It was time for a course correction. So whilst home in Beantown, I hit the cages and worked things out. Realized I was stepping out away from the pitch. Overhauled my swing. Installed a new jump step. Got my timing right. So first game back, first at-bat, I get a fastball down and away, reach for it and rip it to right center for a double. Back in business, baby. I ended up going 2-4 with a couple ribbies, a steal, and two runs scored. Felt fantastic to get things right. And as an added bonus, I nailed down a save in my first pitching stint in Austrian baseball, going three innings with 4 strikeouts. Guess I don’t need a license to pitch in |
|
![]() | |
![]() Nothing recharges the expatriate’s batteries better than a week or so back home in some of the olde haunts. Headed back to I took in a game at the And that’s something that moving to |
|
![]() | |
|
If you want to meet an intelligent, interesting, multilingual European girl, that’s not that hard to do. But if you want to meet an intelligent, interesting, multilingual, non-smoking European girl, well, that’s a tall order, my friend. |
|
![]() | |
|
They’re really cool with nudity over here. I’ve been over this with my first few experiences in the sauna. I’ve seen it along the Danube, where people lay out butt-nekkid in spring and summer along its shores in That said, there’s one lone segment of the population that doesn’t seem to be able to handle it so well. In many of I stood and watched as a bunch of kindergartners pointed and gawked at today’s picture and ended up losing it myself. One girl, as ringleader, was particularly feisty with the picture, shoving it into the faces of her male classmates, eliciting some ear-piercing ‘eeewwws!’ and ‘yeeeecchhs!’ for all the other passengers to hear. After about five minutes of teasing, screaming, and ogling the nude picture, their cantankerous teacher intervened, stuffed the crumpled tabloid into the backpack of the ringleader, chiding her violently as she did so. |
|
![]() | |
|
Been running 100 mph of late, moving apartments (three in one month, but have finally settled on a one-bedroom in the 4th district), finishing up my current employment, seeking new employment, baseball, trips to Carinthia and Slovenia, getting into trouble with the locals, blah de blah de blah. I’ll be heading to That said, I haven’t lost interest in American politics. We’ve got a mighty big choice coming our way in 2008. After eight disastrous years of 43 at the helm, let’s hope we can somehow get to 44 in one piece. But better yet, let’s hope we truly work through who is going to be the best leader for the country, not necessarily the best politician. It’ll be refreshing to get out from underneath the black cloud the country seems to be under, what with our resigned attitude towards Iraq, doomsday predictions about the environment, elevated oil prices and tough energy choices, the Social Security quandary, the list goes on. It’s early, still. Still more than a year from election night. But as I see it now, there seem to be six viable presidential candidates. Barring a surprise entry from Al Gore (50-50, and odds are he’d be a disruptive force were he to run), I see three from the GOP and three from the Democrats. So who am I for? I’m non-partisan. I’ll throw that out there. Since gaining the right to vote, my record in presidential elections has been all over the map: Dole, Nader, Kerry. A Republican, a Green, and a Democrat. I don’t go along party lines. That said, I cannot fathom voting for one of the Republicans in the upcoming presidential election. Just can’t behind any one of them in any meaningful way. The mere fact that McCain calls for escalation of the Romney? Meh. His move from firmly pro-choice to catering to the archconservative wing of the Republican party sealed that deal. But politics aside, Romney does have a strong record of leadership and capable management that might prove useful at a time like this. The fact that he’s Mormon doesn’t matter to me. Giuliani somewhat fascinates me. I know it is en vogue to tout his ‘response’ to September 11 as his greatest asset, but am I alone in asking what exactly it was that he did in the days following 9/11? Sure, he jumped onto TV, inspired a city and a nation in some of its darkest days, and showed that he can handle crisis under agonizing circumstances. But isn’t that what any mayor should do? Would other mayors have done much different? The other popular rap is that he cleaned up But what of foreign policy experience? It’s hard to see him as president, really. And as a NYC Republican, his views are (or were) more in line with my thinking on social issues. But again, he’s moved hard to the right of late (a necessary move during primary season, granted), though it was interesting to hear him maintain his stance on abortion at a recent debate. That was pleasantly surprising. Of all the GOP leaders, he’s the most intriguing to me. I don’t even want to discuss Hillary Clinton. No interest from me there. I simply can’t imagine that Democrats would want to elect such a polarizing figure to the White House, especially after the country has endured eight years of ‘divider not uniter’ Bush at the helm. Further, what does it say about our country that we would have had a succession of Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton presidencies for the past 24 years? I say enough of Bush, and enough of Which leaves John Edwards and Barack Obama. Both are appealing, with Edwards getting a slight nod on experience and mastery of policy. He somehow hasn’t been able to translate that into a strong lead in any of the early polls, though it seems many of the Dem voters do like him. He strikes me more as a VP candidate than anything else. Sort of like what Gore was to Bill Clinton. Obama is the candidate that everyone seems to want to like. Interesting personal history, meteoric rise from Illinois state senate to front-running presidential candidate in a few years, more than a few calling him this generation’s JFK – he seems to have it all going his way right now. Then again, so did Howard Dean. The coming months will show if he’s the real deal or a flash in the pan. I lean ‘real deal,’ but only time will tell. Biden is the one candidate that I think has the foreign policy smarts and experience to really make for a great president, but he simply makes too many mistakes on the trail to be seen as viable. But his mastery of international affairs and experience in the Senate would make him an intriguing candidate. It’s too bad that his ‘articulate and bright and clean’ Obama reference ruined his chances before his campaign even got off the ground. The two dark horses in the race at this point are Al Gore for the Dems and Frank Thompson for the GOP. Both seem to relish in the idea of being a spoiler for either party, and it’s Thompson who just last week seemed to solidify his interest in jumping into the fray. He’s a two-term senator who ‘looks’ presidential, has a bit of gloss on him due to his star turns in some well-known TV series and films, and can squeeze into a Republican pack that has so far seemed to underwhelm the party faithful. We’ll see if he can bring any meat to the table soon he begins to fill in the blanks on his stances on major issues. And what of Gore? Hard to say. Though many liberals seem to clamor for his throwing the hat in the ring, he might just revel in his renaissance over the past 18 months and simply decide to stay out of the backbiting and rigors of yet another presidential contest. Gore seems to enjoy his status as the experienced old hand on the left who was decades ahead of the game on global warming and on the right side of history with his position on the Iraq War. It’s both entertaining and saddening to picture what the world would look like had Gore assumed the presidency in 2000, but instead of wallowing in defeat these past several years, Gore seems to revel in offering a knowing wink to the American voter of What Could Have Been. We’ll see if What Could Have Been morphs into What Could Be in the coming months. Sure to be a fascinating race. I’ll let you know when I find the right man (the lone woman is out, in my book) for the job. |
|
![]() | |
|
And finally, New Rule: conservatives have to stop rolling their eyes every time they hear the word, " And yet, an American politician could not survive if he uttered the simple, true statement, " Now, last week, Now, maybe the high turnout has something to do with the fact that the French candidates are never asked where they stand on evolution, prayer in school, abortion, stem cell research or gay marriage. And if the candidate knows about a character in a book other than Jesus, it's not a drawback. The electorate doesn't vote for the guy they want to have a croissant with; nor do they care about private lives. In the current race, Ségolène Royal has four kids, but she never got married. And she's a Socialist. In Madame Royal's opponent is married, but they live apart and lead separate lives. And the people are okay with that for the same reason they're okay with nude beaches; because they're not a nation of six-year-olds who scream and giggle if they see pee-pee parts. They have weird ideas about privacy. They think it should be private. In Now, like any country, They invented sex during the day, lingerie and the tongue. Can't we admit we could learn something from them? |
|
